We have provided you this booklet and proxy materials on or about April 3, 2014 because the Board of Directors of Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation, doing business as Wabtec Corporation (“Wabtec” or the “Company”), is soliciting your proxy to vote at the company’s 2014 annual meeting of stockholders.

Who May Vote

Stockholders of Wabtec as reflected in our stock records at the close of business on March 18, 2014 may vote. You have one vote for each share of Wabtec common stock you own.

How to Vote

You may vote in person at the meeting or by proxy. We recommend you vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the meeting. You can always change your vote at the meeting. Your vote is important.

If you are a stockholder whose shares are registered in your name, you may vote your shares in person at the meeting or by one of the three following methods:

If you vote by Internet or telephone, you do not need to request a proxy card.

Shares registered in your name are generally covered by one Notice. If you hold shares through someone else, such as a bank, stockbroker, or trustee you will get a Notice from them asking you to vote. Please follow the instructions on their Notice. Please vote with respect to each Notice you receive.

How a Proxy Works

Giving us a proxy means you authorize us to vote your shares in accordance with your directions. If you return your signed proxy card but do not make any selections as to how you wish to vote on a particular matter, your shares will be voted in favor of our director candidates, in favor of the approval of the advisory (non-binding) resolution relating to the approval of the 2013 named executive officer compensation, and in favor of ratifying the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP, as the case may be.

Changing Your Vote

You may revoke your proxy before it is voted by submitting a new proxy with a later date including a proxy given over the Internet or by telephone, by voting in person at the meeting or by a notification in writing to the Secretary of Wabtec at 1001 Air Brake Avenue, Wilmerding, PA 15148.

Common Stock Outstanding

As of the close of business on March 18, 2014, approximately 96,448,031 shares of Wabtec common stock were issued and outstanding. All share and per share amounts in this proxy statement have been adjusted to reflect the two for one stock split (in the form of a 100% stock dividend) of Wabtec common stock effected on June 11, 2013.

Quorum and Voting Information

To conduct the business of the meeting, we must have a quorum. This means at least a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote must be present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. You are considered a part of the quorum if you vote over the Internet, by telephone or by submitting a properly signed proxy card if you requested copies of the proxy materials.

Abstentions and broker non-votes (i.e., proxies submitted by brokers that do not indicate a vote for a proposal because they do not have discretionary voting authority and have not received instructions as to how to vote on the proposal) are counted as present in determining whether the quorum requirement for the annual meeting is satisfied.

To be elected, nominees for director must receive a plurality of the votes cast. This means that the three director nominees with the most votes are elected. With regard to the election of directors, votes may be cast in favor of or withheld from each nominee. Votes that are withheld will be excluded entirely from the vote and will have no effect. Broker non-votes and abstentions with respect to the election of directors will have no effect on the outcome of the election of directors.

The approval of each of Proposals 2 and 3 requires a favorable vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote on the applicable matter. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against each applicable proposal. Broker non-votes with respect to Proposals 2 and 3 will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to that proposal.

Approval of any other matter that properly comes before the annual meeting requires the favorable vote of a majority of shares present and entitled to vote on the matter, unless the matter requires more than a majority vote under statute or our amended and restated by-laws. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes with respect to any such proposal will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to that proposal.

If your shares are held by a broker, the broker will ask you how you want your shares to be voted. If you give the broker instructions, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you do not give instructions, one of two things can happen, depending on the type of proposal. For the ratification of the independent auditor (Proposal 3), the broker may vote your shares in its discretion. For all other proposals, the broker may not vote your shares at all if you do not give instructions.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership

Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in beneficial ownership of Wabtec stock. Directors and officers must furnish us with copies of these reports. Based on these copies and directors’ and executive officers’ representations,

we believe all directors and executive officers complied with the requirements of Section 16(a) in 2013; except that a Form 4 for Robert C. Bourg was inadvertently filed late to show the exercise of common stock options, a Form 4 for Karl-Heinz Colmer was inadvertently filed late to show the grant of common stock, and a Form 4 for Mr. Fernandez was inadvertently filed late to show a sale of common stock.

Wabtec’s Board of Directors currently has nine members and three vacant seats. The Board is divided into three classes whose terms of office end in successive years. Emilio A. Fernandez, Lee B. Foster, II, and Gary C. Valade, whose terms of office are expiring, have been nominated to serve for new terms ending in 2017. All nominations were made by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, as further described under “The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee” on page 11, and approved by the entire Board of Directors.

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines require our directors to possess qualities and skills necessary to oversee the management of Wabtec. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter establishes a commitment to find nominees for membership on the Board of Directors that are of the highest possible caliber and are able to provide insightful, intelligent and effective guidance to the management of Wabtec. As part of this process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Charter requires the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to ensure that the Board of Directors consists of individuals from diverse educational and professional experiences and backgrounds who, collectively, provide meaningful counsel to management. Under the Corporate Governance Guidelines, it is the responsibility of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to establish, and from time to time review with the Board, the requisite skills and characteristics for new Board members. In assessing potential nominees, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will take into account the following criteria:

With respect to nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the committee also reviews and considers each nominee’s contributions to the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance

Committee’s process to recommend qualified director candidates is further described on page 11 under “The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.” As described above, and although the Board does not have a separate diversity policy, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity as one of a number of factors in identifying nominees for director pursuant to its charter. The Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believe it is essential that the Board members represent diverse backgrounds. In considering nominees for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee conducts inquiries into the background and qualifications of possible candidates and actively recruits qualified individuals. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses the effectiveness of its approach as part of the annual review of its charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines and as part of its annual review of the effectiveness of the Board and each committee of the Board.

The description of each director and each nominee set forth below includes biographical information, on a director by director basis, and highlights the specific experience, qualifications, attributes, background and education of each director and each nominee that led the Board to conclude that each director or nominee should serve on the Board. In addition to the qualifications described in the biographical information set forth below, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Board also determined that each director and each nominee possesses certain intangible attributes and skills, which led to the conclusion that each director and each nominee meets the criteria set forth in the Corporate Governance Guidelines and is qualified to serve as one of our directors. These intangible attributes and skills include, as to each nominee, integrity, the capacity to evaluate business issues and make practical and mature judgments, willingness to devote the necessary time and effort required to serve on our Board, the skills and personality to work effectively and collegially with other directors on a Board that is responsive to Wabtec’s needs, and the self-confidence and communication skills to participate effectively in Board discussions.

Vote Required

Your proxy will be voted “for” the election of these nominees unless you withhold authority to vote for any one or more of them. If any nominee is unable or unwilling to stand for election, your proxy authorizes us to vote for a replacement nominee if the Board names one.

Only votes “for” a candidate are counted in the election of directors. The three nominees who receive the most votes will be elected as directors.

The Board recommends you vote FOR each of the following director nominees.

The Board and Committees

The Board met eight times during 2013; had two joint meetings with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee; and approved actions by unanimous written consent on one occasion. All directors attended more than 75% of all meetings of the Board and the committees on which they served in 2013. The standing Board committees that help the Board fulfill its duties include the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. The Board also holds regularly scheduled meetings of non-employee directors.

In addition to the independence requirements set forth in the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), the Board has adopted categorical standards to assist it in determining whether its members meet the independence requirements of the NYSE. These standards provide that the following relationships are deemed to be immaterial and would not in and of themselves impair a director’s independence:

The Board has reviewed the independence of its members considering these standards and any other commercial, legal, accounting and familial relationships between the directors and Wabtec and has determined that all of its members are independent, with the exception of Mr. Neupaver. Specifically, none of such independent directors has a material relationship with Wabtec, and each such

director meets the Board’s categorical independence standards and the independence requirements of the NYSE listing standards. It is the company’s policy that all directors attend the annual meeting of stockholders if reasonably possible. All directors attended the 2013 annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Leadership Structure

Since May 2013, Mr. Neupaver has served as Chairman of the Board. The Board believes that Mr. Neupaver’s combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer has been in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders, and that Mr. Neupaver is the Director best situated to serve as Chairman because of his detailed and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges facing the Company, his familiarity with the Company’s business and industry, and his ability to identify strategic priorities essential to the future success of the Company. The Board believes that this structure has provided clear leadership responsibility and accountability, while providing for effective corporate governance and oversight by an independent Board of strong and seasoned Directors with an independent Lead Director. Our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Kassling as “Lead Director” to preside at all 2013 executive sessions of “non-management” directors, as defined under the rules of the NYSE. Our Board has also appointed him as “Lead Director” to preside at all such 2014 executive sessions. The Board generally holds such executive sessions at every regularly scheduled Board meeting. At least one executive session each year is required to be attended only by independent directors.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors is responsible for overseeing and monitoring the material risks facing the company.

In its oversight role, the Board of Directors annually reviews Wabtec’s strategic plan, which addresses, among other things, the risks and opportunities facing the company. The Board also has overall responsibility for executive officer succession planning and reviews succession plans each year. The Board has delegated certain risk management oversight responsibility to the Board committees. As

part of its responsibilities set forth in its charter, the Audit Committee is responsible for discussing with management Wabtec’s major risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures, including the company’s risk assessment and risk management policies. In this regard, Wabtec’s management prepares a comprehensive risk assessment report and reviews that report with the Audit Committee each Board meeting. This report identifies the material business risks (including strategic, operational, financial reporting and compliance risks) for the company as a whole, as well as for each business unit and for corporate common services, and identifies the controls that respond to and mitigate those risks. Wabtec’s management regularly evaluates these controls, and periodically reports to the Audit Committee regarding the controls’ design and effectiveness. The Audit Committee also receives annual reports from management on Wabtec’s ethics program and on environmental compliance. The Compensation Committee extensively reviewed the elements of compensation to determine whether any portion of compensation encouraged excessive risk taking and concluded:

Furthermore, as described in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation decisions include subjective considerations, which restrain the influence of objective factors on excessive risk taking.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews Wabtec’s Corporate Governance Guidelines and their implementation. Each committee reports to the full Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee approved continued use of its written charter at its February 10, 2014 meeting. A current copy of the charter is available on Wabtec’s website at http://www.wabtec.com.

The principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are to:

The Committee met five times during 2013, which includes two joint meetings with the Board of Directors. The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in 2013 were Mr. Brooks, Mr. Fernandez, Mr. Howell and Mr. Vande Steeg, who were each independent, as independence for such members is defined in the listing standards of the NYSE and the rules of the SEC. Mr. Fernandez is the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Hehir was added as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee in February 2014.

The Committee will consider director nominees recommended by stockholders. Stockholders wishing to recommend a director candidate for consideration by the Committee can do so by writing the Secretary of Wabtec at 1001 Air Brake Avenue, Wilmerding, PA 15148 and giving the candidate’s name, biographical data and qualifications. Any such recommendation should be accompanied by a written statement from the individual of his or her consent to be named as a candidate and, if nominated and elected, to serve as a director. No candidates for Board membership have been put forward by stockholders for election at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders. Our amended and restated by-laws require that for a stockholder to recommend a director nominee, notice in writing must be given to the Secretary of Wabtec no later than the 60th day and no earlier than the 120th day prior to the first

anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting proxy statement.

In evaluating candidates for the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the entirety of each candidate’s credentials. The Committee is guided by the goal set forth in its charter of ensuring that the Board consists of individuals from diverse backgrounds (including diversity of gender, race and ethnicity) who collectively provide meaningful counsel to management. The Committee also considers the candidate’s character, integrity, experience, understanding of strategy and policy-setting and reputation for working well with others. In connection with this evaluation, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines whether to interview the prospective nominee and, if warranted, one or more members of the committee, and others as appropriate, interview prospective nominees. After completing this evaluation and interview, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to the persons who should be nominated by the Board, and the Board determines the nominees after considering the recommendation and report of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. If candidates are recommended by the company’s stockholders, such candidates will be evaluated using the same criteria. With respect to nomination of continuing directors for re-election, the individual’s contributions to the Board are also considered.

The Audit Committee

The Audit Committee acts under a written charter. The Audit Committee reviewed and approved the continued use of its written charter at its February 10, 2014 meeting. A current copy of the charter is available on Wabtec’s website at http://www.wabtec.com.

The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibility to stockholders, the investment community and others relating to the integrity of Wabtec’s financial statements, its financial reporting process, its systems of internal accounting and financial controls, the performance of Wabtec’s internal audit function and independent registered public accountants, the independent registered public accountant’s

qualifications and independence, and Wabtec’s compliance with ethics policies and legal and regulatory requirements. The Committee is directly responsible for appointing, compensating, retaining and overseeing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm engaged by Wabtec. The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by Wabtec regarding accounting, internal controls or auditing matters and the confidential anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters.

The Audit Committee met seven times in 2013. The members of the Audit Committee in 2013 were Mr. Brooks, Mr. Foster, Mr. Hehir, Mr. Fernandez and Mr. Valade. Each of the foregoing members of the Audit Committee during 2013, and currently, is independent, as independence is defined in the rules of the SEC and in the listing standards of the NYSE. The Board has determined that Mr. Valade, the Audit Committee’s Chairman, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in the regulations of the SEC.

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing Wabtec’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management of the company has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls. In the performance of our oversight function, we meet with management periodically to consider the adequacy of the company’s internal controls and the objectivity of its financial reporting. We meet privately with the independent registered public accountants, who have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee. Specifically, we have reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accountants the company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

The Audit Committee discussed and reviewed with the Company’s independent auditors all communications required by auditing standards of the PCAOB (United States), including those described in PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16, “Communications with Audit Committees,” and Rule 2-07, “Communication with Audit Committees,” of

Regulation S-X and, with and without management present, discussed and reviewed the results of the independent auditors examination of the financial statements. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed various matters with the independent auditors related to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, including all critical accounting policies and practices used, all alternative treatments for material items that have been discussed with the management of the Company, and all other material written communications between the independent auditors and management.

Furthermore, we have received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accountants required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and have discussed with the independent registered public accountants their independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to above, we recommended to the Board of Directors that Wabtec’s audited financial statements, as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted,

Gary C. Valade, Chairman

Robert J. Brooks

Lee B. Foster, II

Brian P. Hehir

Emilio A. Fernandez

The Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee provides assistance to the Board relating to the compensation of Wabtec’s officers and directors. The Compensation Committee has authority, pursuant to its charter, to make recommendations to the Board, which then establishes compensation. The Compensation Committee’s principal responsibilities include:

The Compensation Committee members in 2013 were Mr. Foster, Mr. Hehir, Mr. Howell and Mr. Vande Steeg, who were each independent, as independence for such members is defined in the rules of the SEC and the listing standards of the NYSE. In addition, the Compensation Committee members each qualify as “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Mr. Foster served as the Compensation Committee’s Chairman. The Nominating and Governance Committee recommends the Compensation Committee members who are approved by the full Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee met five times in 2013. The Compensation Committee approved continued use of its written charter at its February 10, 2014 meeting. A copy of the written charter is available on Wabtec’s website at http://www.wabtec.com.

The Compensation Committee reviews our executive compensation arrangements and recommends changes or adjustments to the Board, which then establishes these items. Base salaries are established at the beginning of the fiscal year and bonuses are awarded after fiscal year results are available. Base salaries depend mainly on the executive officer’s position and responsibility, while bonuses are based on pre-established performance factors. These factors are established at the beginning of the year and include (i) a financial performance factor measuring either earnings per share or earnings before interest and taxes, and working capital management, and (ii) a personal performance factor which measures whether the individual executive attained certain quantitative and measureable goals established for that executive.

Executive officers also receive long-term incentive compensation. With respect to the long-term incentive portion of executive compensation, the Compensation Committee has discretion to grant equity-based, long-term incentive awards under our 2011 Stock Incentive Plan. Such awards take the form of stock options, performance units and restricted share awards. The Compensation Committee bases the amount of the award upon the

executive’s job level, as well as other factors. These factors include benchmarking the total compensation an executive may earn to ensure it is competitive, compensating executives in a “pay for performance” manner and aligning the interests of the executives with the interests of the shareholders. The Committee also reviews the ratio of total compensation to total target cash compensation to ensure that the mix of long-term compensation is appropriate for each executive.

The Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President of Human Resources suggest guidelines in discussions with the Compensation Committee regarding executive compensation. They provide recommendations and information regarding the competitiveness of the industry, key employees, performance of individuals, succession planning and other relevant data to the committee. The Chief Executive Officer is not present during any discussions concerning his own compensation. The Compensation Committee also has the authority to retain compensation consultants, advisors and legal counsel as it deems necessary and has the sole authority to approve such consultants’ fees, which are payable by the Company. The Compensation Committee engaged the consulting firm Pay Governance, LLC (“Pay Governance”) during 2013. During its engagement, Pay Governance provided the following services: (i) reviewed and assessed the Company’s current compensation practices for executives and non-employee directors; (ii) reviewed the current peer group and made recommendations to update the peer group; (iii) reviewed and provided a pay for performance assessment of the Chief Executive Officer compensation; and (iv) provided benchmarking of peer group and relevant industry data.

During 2013, the Compensation Committee proposed a recoupment policy that was ratified by the Board. The recoupment policy provides that in the event of a financial restatement or a determination by the Board that misconduct by a responsible party caused financial or reputational harm to the Company,

recoupment of cash bonuses and equity awarded as well as gains realized from the exercise of options may be pursued.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2013, Wabtec had no interlocking relationships in which (i) an executive officer of Wabtec served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of Wabtec; (ii) an executive officer of Wabtec served as a director of another entity, one of whose executive officers served on the Compensation Committee of Wabtec; or (iii) an executive officer of Wabtec served as a member of the compensation committee of another entity, one of whose executive officers served as a director of Wabtec. No member of the Compensation Committee was at any time during the 2013 fiscal year or at any other time an officer or employee of the company, and no member had any relationship with us requiring disclosure under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included on pages 15 through 20 of this proxy statement with management.

Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement, and incorporated by reference in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC.

Respectfully submitted,

Lee B. Foster, II, Chairman

Brian P. Hehir

Nickolas W. Vande Steeg

Michael W. D. Howell

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview. This compensation discussion describes the material elements of compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to each of our executive officers who served as named executive officers during 2013. This discussion focuses primarily on the fiscal year 2013 information contained in the following tables and related footnotes and narrative. We discuss compensation actions taken prior to 2013 or in 2014 if we believe it provides relevant information.

The principal elements of our executive compensation program are base salary, annual cash incentives, and long-term equity incentives in the form of restricted stock awards and units, stock options and performance units. Our other benefits and perquisites consist of life and health insurance benefits, social and health club dues, and a qualified 401(k) savings plan (including company matching contributions). Our philosophy is to position the aggregate of these elements at the average of that paid to executives with similar responsibilities. To ensure that the company is able to attract and retain high potential executives, the company benchmarks executive compensation using compensation surveys of similar-sized companies and also uses an index average of similar-sized manufacturing companies. This index is comprised of: Briggs and Stratton,

Regal Beloit, Woodward Inc., IDEX Corp., Kennametal, Trinity Industries, Greenbrier Companies, Actuant, Ametek, Crane Co., Donaldson, Koppers Holdings, Titan International, WABCO Holdings, ITT Corporation, Pall Corporation, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc., Valmont Industries, and Harsco Corp (the “Peer Index Group”).

Objectives and Philosophy. The overall objectives of our executive compensation program are to (i) enable us to attract, motivate and retain key executive talent essential to the achievement of our short-term and long-term business objectives; (ii) provide compensation competitive with others in our industry; (iii) reward senior executive officers in a “pay for performance” manner for accomplishment of pre-defined business goals and objectives; and (iv) align the interests of our executives with our stockholders. A significant portion of total executive compensation is variable compensation linked to corporate, business unit and individual performance. Our objective is to provide a significant portion of an executive’s total compensation in a form that is contingent upon achieving established performance goals. In regard to compensation based on performance, our objective is to provide a significant portion of such compensation in the form of equity awards.

In setting base salaries at the beginning of the year, the Compensation Committee generally reviews information about compensation practices and levels in Wabtec’s industry and the position and responsibility of the particular executive which is publicly available or provided by the Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President of Human Resources. The Committee also uses benchmarking

to establish base salaries as discussed below. The annual incentive award for 2013 is a cash award determined by the Compensation Committee based on pre-established performance factors. These factors are established at the beginning of the year and include (i) a financial performance factor measuring either earnings per share or earnings before interest and taxes, and working capital management, and

(ii) a personal performance factor which measures whether the individual executive attained pre-determined goals and objectives established for that executive which are tied to the overall company strategic objectives for that year. Long-term incentives in the form of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units are granted to provide the opportunity for long-term compensation based upon the performance of Wabtec and its ability to meet its long-term goals and objectives.

Compensation Process.

Compensation Committee. Executive officer compensation is administered by the Compensation Committee. The Committee approved the 2013 compensation arrangements for executive officers, including base salaries, bonuses and equity awards, described in this compensation discussion and analysis and recommended them to the full Board, which then approved them. Our Board of Directors delegates to the Compensation Committee the direct responsibility for, among other matters:

Role of Compensation Experts. Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee is authorized to engage compensation consultants to assist it with its duties. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to engage any outside counsel or other experts or consultants to assist it in the evaluation of compensation of our directors and executive officers, including the sole authority to approve such consultants’ fees and other retention terms. The Compensation Committee may also obtain advice from legal, accounting, human resources and other advisors as it deems necessary. The Compensation Committee engaged the consulting firm Pay Governance during 2013. During its engagement, Pay Governance provided the following services: (i) reviewed and assessed the Company’s current compensation practices for executives and non-employee directors; (ii) reviewed the current peer

group and made recommendations to update the peer group; (iii) reviewed and provided a pay for performance assessment of the Chief Executive Officer compensation; and (iv) provided benchmarking of peer group and relevant industry data.

Role of Our Executive Officers in the Compensation Process. The Chief Executive Officer and the Senior Vice President of Human Resources suggest guidelines in discussions with the Compensation Committee regarding executive compensation. They provide recommendations and information regarding the competitiveness of the industry, key employees, performance of individuals, succession and other relevant data to the committee. The Chief Executive Officer is not present during any discussions concerning his own compensation.

Components of Compensation.

Our 2013 compensation program elements were primarily structured to reward our executive officers for achieving certain financial and business objectives.

Base Salaries. Base salaries for our executive officers are reviewed annually and depend mainly on the executive’s office and responsibility and are based on the competitive average for executives with similar responsibilities in peer group companies. In this regard, the company uses two different benchmarks, one a broader benchmark study based on manufacturing companies that are between $1.0 billion and $3.0 billion in revenue and a second study that is an index average of the members of the Peer Index Group. Individual salaries may be above or below the competitive average based on the individual’s contribution to business results, capabilities and qualifications, potential and the importance of the individual’s position to our success.

For fiscal year 2013, the base salary increases of our named executive officers ranged from 0% to 53.14% as a result of this process. These increases are discussed further in connection with the “Summary Compensation Table” which follows.

Annual Cash Incentive Awards. Our annual incentive award plan is intended to: (i) compensate participants

directly if strategic and financial performance targets are achieved and (ii) reward participants for performance on those activities that are most directly under their control and for which they are held accountable. Corporate, business unit and individual performance goals under the annual incentive plan are linked to the annual business plan and budget. The actual amount of bonuses are a function of the company’s overall financial performance, the participant’s individual performance and Board approval. Bonuses are based upon the success of two factors: a financial performance factor or “FPF” (ranging from 0 to 1.5 maximum), that measures either earnings per share or earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”) and working capital management; and a personal performance factor or “PPF” (ranging from 0 to 1.5 maximum) that measures whether the executive has attained certain goals agreed to by the executive, the executive’s supervisor, and the Board. The bonus formula is based on the product of the participant’s base salary, the participant’s target bonus percentage, the FPF and the PPF. If both the financial performance factor and

the applicable personal performance factor were achieved, the named executive officers would earn 100% of their target bonus. To qualify for a minimum payout under the bonus plan, the business unit or company, as applicable to the particular participant, must achieve at least 80% of its plan’s EBIT and 80% of its working capital plan target for the year. We believe that this philosophy encourages Wabtec and our executives to establish ambitious goals and that it promotes teamwork, productivity and profitability. Overall, total cash compensation (the sum of salary and bonus) for our executive officers is competitive with market practice for similar executive positions in similar companies when performance goals under the annual bonus plan are achieved. Target bonuses and performance factors were approved by the Compensation Committee at its meeting in February 2013. For 2013, the Company’s actual EBIT, EPS and working capital results exceeded the respective targets resulting in an FPF of 1.10 out of a maximum factor possible under the annual incentive plan of 1.5.

Mr. Neupaver, Mr. Garcia-Tunon, Mr. Betler, and Mr. DeNinno participated in the annual incentive plan and each of them, due to the company’s performance and their individual performance achieved greater than their target bonus. Mr. Kovac achieved less than his target bonus during the year. The bonuses received as a result are reflected in the non-equity incentive plan compensation column of the “Summary Compensation Table” below.

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. We currently administer our long-term incentive compensation through the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, under which we grant stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance units. As of December 31, 2013, a total of 3,731,087 shares of common stock are available for issuance under the plan. The plan is administered by the Compensation

Committee. During 2013, the company made the following grants of equity awards: 118,392 shares of restricted stock, 37,620 restricted stock units, 116,392 stock options and 198,990 performance units. Equity awards made in February, 2013 to all named executive officers are detailed under the table “2013 Grants of Plan Based Awards” on page 23. Options and restricted stock are generally granted to employees, including our executive officers, each February as part of their long term compensation. Additional awards were made throughout the year to new hires, current employees in connection with promotions, and key management obtained through acquisitions. We vary the relative amounts of options and restricted stock granted in a given year based on a number of factors including the overall performance of the company, the stock price and retention of key management. The primary purposes

of the long-term incentive program are to align the interests of executive officers and other key employees with those of our stockholders, to attract and retain key executive talent and to provide an incentive to meet and exceed long-term financial goals. Employees eligible for the long-term incentive program include those who are determined by the Compensation Committee to be in key policy-setting and decision-making roles, and to have responsibilities that contribute significantly to achieving our earnings goals. The size of an individual’s long-term incentive award is based primarily on individual performance, the individual’s responsibilities and position with our company. Long-term incentive award values generally are competitive with market practice for comparable executive positions in similar companies based on the Peer Index Group and other relevant data reviewed by the Committee.

Any awards made under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan may be recovered (a “clawback”) by the company in the discretion of the Compensation Committee if between the date of grant and the third anniversary of any exercise, payment or vesting of the award, the participant:

The clawback does not apply following the occurrence of a change of control event unless the award agreement specifically so provides or as required by applicable law.

Stock options and restricted stock are a part of our long-term incentive compensation program that seeks to align the interests of our executives with our stockholders. We have typically granted stock options and restricted stock in February of the applicable year. We have historically awarded options to purchase our common stock to executive officers at the fair market value (average of the high and low price) of our common stock at the grant date. We have not back-dated any option awards. The vesting schedule for each grant of options and restricted stock is determined by the Compensation Committee and has typically been in 25% increments over a four-year period, subject to continued employment with the Company. In February 2013, we granted both restricted stock and stock options to all named executive officers as part of their long-term compensation with the company. The grant date fair value of those awards is reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 21.

The company also administers a rolling three-year long-term incentive program using performance units. This program is designed to reward executives for meeting or exceeding economic profit growth goals. Economic profit is a measure of the extent to which the company produces financial results in excess of its cost of capital. The program is structured as a rolling three-year plan; each year starts a new three-year performance cycle with the most recently commenced cycle being 2014-2016. For each executive selected to participate in this program, we establish a target grant of performance units at the beginning of each three-year performance cycle. A performance unit is equal to a share of Wabtec common stock. If Wabtec achieves its three-year cumulative economic profit goal, then participants will earn the target grant of performance units. In general, the goals increase each year taking into account expected market conditions, and are intended to reflect a superior performance by management. If Wabtec achieves the maximum three-year cumulative economic profit goal, a participant will earn a maximum number (equal to two times the target level) of performance units. If Wabtec achieves the threshold three-year cumulative economic profit goal, a participant will earn a

threshold number (equal to one-quarter of the target level) of performance units. No performance units will be earned for performance below the three-year cumulative economic profit threshold and no additional performance units will be earned for performance exceeding the three-year cumulative economic profit maximum. This program is intended to encourage the long-term stability of Wabtec’s management by establishing ambitious goals designed to promote the long-term productivity and profitability of the company. If a program participant leaves the company voluntarily, or is terminated for cause, he or she is not eligible to receive any performance units he or she may have earned under the program. If a program participant otherwise leaves the company, his or her payout may be pro-rated in accordance with the amount of time he or she participated in the program relative to the performance period. For the 2013–2015 performance cycle, the Compensation Committee approved target goals based on cumulative economic profit for the performance period. These goals were based on a range of considerations including expected demand in Wabtec’s key end user markets, investor expectations and management’s business plan which includes year over year growth.

For the 2011-2013 performance period, Wabtec achieved 200% of its target three-year cumulative economic profit goal of $203.5 million for the 2011–2013 performance cycle, which resulted in the following payouts in March 2014 to the named executive officers:

Under the terms of the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan (as described below), Mr. Kovac elected to defer 100% of the payout. Such deferral will be placed in his individual deferral account. Executive Officers as a group received 288,000

shares of Wabtec common stock with a value at payout of $22,640,688.

Stock Ownership Requirements. In February 2007, Wabtec approved stock ownership guidelines for executive management and for non-employee board members. These guidelines were established to encourage our key employees and Board members to own and retain shares of stock. The guidelines are as follows: President and CEO to accumulate shares having a value equal to seven times base salary; executive officers to accumulate shares having a value equal to three times base salary; general managers and equivalent to accumulate shares having a value equal to two times base salary; and non-employee Board members to accumulate shares having a value equal to four times their cash retainer. These ownership guidelines are to be achieved within three to five years and are defined as a multiple of base salary for executives and a multiple of cash compensation for the non-employee board members. Except for Mr. DeNinno who joined Wabtec in 2012, each of the executive officers and non-employee board members has met their required stock ownership described above. As of March 18, 2014, our directors and executive officers as a group owned approximately 5.25% of our common stock.

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits. Supplemental benefits are offered to selected executive officers with the goal of attracting and retaining key executive talent. Those perquisites may include: life and health insurance benefits and social and health club dues.

Deferred Compensation Plan. In December 2009, the Board approved and adopted a deferred compensation plan for executive officers and non-employee directors. Under the terms of the plan, eligible employee executive officers may elect to defer their base salary, bonus and/or long term incentive payout. Non-employee directors may elect to defer the annual stock and/or cash retainer, provided that any deferral of the stock retainer will be subject to the same vesting and forfeiture conditions as if the stock retainer had not been deferred. For the executive officers during 2013, Mr. Kovac elected to defer 50% of his annual cash incentive award and 100% of his long term incentive payout. For the non-employee directors, Mr. Kassling elected to defer 100% of the cash retainer, Mr. Foster and Mr. Kassling elected to defer 100% of their

respective stock retainers and Mr. Howell elected to defer 50% of his stock retainer.

Post-Termination Compensation.

The company does not generally provide employment agreements to its executive officers. The Board of Directors has entered into employment continuation agreements with nine senior executive officers, including the following named executive officers: Albert J. Neupaver, Alvaro Garcia-Tunon, Raymond T. Betler, David L. DeNinno and Charles F. Kovac. These agreements are discussed below generally, and only become effective in the event of a change of control of Wabtec. Also discussed below, certain of our benefit plans contain provisions that address termination of an individual or a change in control of the company. Mr. Garcia-Tunon’s employment continuation agreement terminated upon his retirement, effective January 1, 2014.

Tax Implications of Executive Compensation. Our deductions for compensation payable to the named executive officers (other than the Chief Financial Officer) are potentially limited by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), to the extent the aggregate amount paid to an executive officer exceeds $1 million, unless it is paid under a predetermined objective performance plan meeting certain requirements, or satisfies one of various other exceptions specified in the Code. We generally seek to preserve the income tax-

deductibility of compensation paid to our executive officers. Notwithstanding this general policy, the Compensation Committee retains the authority to approve compensation arrangements under which not all compensation paid to covered individuals would be tax-deductible, if such payments are deemed to be in the best interests of both Wabtec and its stockholders.

Accounting Considerations with Regard to Compensation Practices. The Compensation Committee reviews on an on-going basis the impact of our compensation programs on Wabtec’s financial statements, including the accounting treatment of equity-based compensation, and the Compensation Committee’s decisions may be influenced by such factors.

Role of 2013 Advisory Vote on Executive

Compensation in the Compensation Setting Process.

The Compensation Committee reviewed the results of the 2013 stockholder advisory vote on executive officer compensation and incorporated the results as one of the many factors considered in connection with the discharge of its responsibilities. Because a substantial majority (approximately 97.59%) of our stockholders approved the compensation program described in our 2013 proxy statement, the Compensation Committee did not implement changes to our executive compensation program as a direct result of the stockholders’ advisory vote.